+
+ # send out config broadcasts
+ foreach $dxchan (@dxchan) {
+ next unless $dxchan->is_node;
+
+ # send out a PC92 config record if required for me and
+ # all my non pc9x dependent nodes. But for dependent nodes we only do
+ # this if we have not seen any from anyone else for at least half
+ # of one update period. This should stop quite a bit of excess C
+ # records. Someone will win, it does not really matter who, because
+ # we always believe "us".
+ if ($main::systime >= $dxchan->{next_pc92_update}) {
+ dbg("ROUTE: pc92 broadcast candidate: $dxchan->{call}") if isdbg('obscount');
+ if ($dxchan == $main::me || !$dxchan->{do_pc9x}) {
+ my $ref = Route::Node::get($dxchan->{call});
+ if ($dxchan == $main::me || ($ref && ($ref->measure_pc9x_t($main::systime-$main::systime_daystart)) >= $pc92_update_period/2)) {
+ $dxchan->broadcast_pc92_update($dxchan->{call});
+ } else {
+ $dxchan->update_pc92_next($pc92_update_period - rand(60));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if ($pc92_slug_changes && $main::systime >= $last_pc92_slug + $pc92_slug_changes) {
+ my ($add, $del) = gen_pc92_changes();
+ $main::me->route_pc92d($main::mycall, undef, $main::routeroot, @$del) if @$del;
+ $main::me->route_pc92a($main::mycall, undef, $main::routeroot, @$add) if @$add;
+ clear_pc92_changes();
+ }